 | 
 |
| Author |
Message |
mike keener Guest
|
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:43 am Post subject: binoculars |
|
|
I am going on an elk hunt and would like to have you recommend a pair of binoculars. I would like to keep it under $400 unless there is a pair that is really a lot more bang for the buck that costs a little more. Could you please help me with this?
Thanks, Mike |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jne_K Site Admin
Joined: 24 Sep 2003 Posts: 5621
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mike keener Guest
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:00 pm Post subject: binoculars |
|
|
I was reading the info on the binoculars hunting page. It seemed to imply that not much was to be gained by getting out of the $200 - $300 range. In your opinion am I getting something extra with either of the 2 you have recommended or should I look to a set in the above price range. If so, what would it be?
Thanks, Mike |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jne_K Site Admin
Joined: 24 Sep 2003 Posts: 5621
|
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 5:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi
Not exactly. You do get the most bang for the buck at $300 in terms of features and optics, but that does not mean you don't gain by moving to a more expensive binocular, especially if it is a matter of durability. If you are using a binocular hard and want it to last for many years, buying a more expensive binocular is cheaper in the long run. Professional guides, who depend on a binocular for their living, do not bother with $200 binoculars for that very reason. Lastly, you do see an improvement in optics between $300 and $400. The gain is slight, but I think the it is well worth it, though that is something you need to decide for yourself. Just a matter of how fussy you are about your optics and also your expectations.
At the $300 price point there are far too many binoculars to list and, due to the comnpetition, you can't go wrong with any of them. The two I mentioned are as good as it gets at $400, but at $300 I would start with the Nikon Monarch, the Eagle Optics Ranger, Leupold Olympic to name just a few. _________________ Thanks for posting with us
Joanie K - Your personal optics expert
Forum: http://www.opticsplanet.com/msgboard
Blog: http://blog.opticsplanet.com/
Store: http://www.opticsplanet.net/
Phone: 847-513-6201
Fax: 847-919-3003 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spyglass Guest
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 5:48 am Post subject: 7x42FL v 7x42EDG |
|
|
| But the EDG is about $170 more....haven't seen 1 yet but have the FL, and really don't think the Nikon is gonna out-anything the Zeiss...and I'm a big Nikon fan (have all 3 versions of the SE, and all are definite keepers). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jne_K Site Admin
Joined: 24 Sep 2003 Posts: 5621
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 6:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi
I agree in terms of optics, but I definitely prefer the metal construction and open tube design on the EDG compared to the plastic/polymer construction on the Victory FL. In my tests, for instance, the EDG definitely focused smoother and, for me, a nicer handling bino.
I also have an SE, but never going to sell it either. _________________ Thanks for posting with us
Joanie K - Your personal optics expert
Forum: http://www.opticsplanet.com/msgboard
Blog: http://blog.opticsplanet.com/
Store: http://www.opticsplanet.net/
Phone: 847-513-6201
Fax: 847-919-3003 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|