 | 
 |
| Author |
Message |
opticsplanet.com Site Admin
Joined: 23 Sep 2003 Posts: 4045 Location: Prospect Heighs, IL
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 8:46 am Post subject: mak vs refractor |
|
|
| Quote: | | I am not certain if the Mak (Bushnell Mak 90) scopes are the way to go or to get perhaps a 90mm refractor...your input is appreciated. |
_________________ ----------------------
Your personal optics expert
Joanie (Jne) K
http://www.OpticsPlanet.com
Phone: (888) 263-0356
Fax: (847) 574-6820
Last edited by opticsplanet.com on Tue May 24, 2005 8:48 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
opticsplanet.com Site Admin
Joined: 23 Sep 2003 Posts: 4045 Location: Prospect Heighs, IL
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi
A 90mm Mak, in this case the Bushnell, will provide images that are equal or superior to a achromatic 90mm refractor in terms of color correction and will equal such a refractor in terms of image resolution. The refractor will typically be slightly brighter and will also offer slightly more contrast, but between the two, you will not notice a great deal of difference optically.
The Mak, however, offers a significant advantage in terms of compactness and portability. (A 90mm f/9 refractor will be a much larger instrument.) The Bushnell Mak also does a great job as a spotting scope for daytime use. (A large refractor, especially one on an equatorial mount, is much more awkward to use by day.) _________________ ----------------------
Your personal optics expert
Joanie (Jne) K
http://www.OpticsPlanet.com
Phone: (888) 263-0356
Fax: (847) 574-6820 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|