 | 
 |
| Author |
Message |
eric Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 11:23 am Post subject: need a telescope for $350 to $400 |
|
|
| Well my title is self explainatory. I don't want a computerized one, and I am leaning toward a refractor. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
opticsplanet.com Site Admin
Joined: 23 Sep 2003 Posts: 4044 Location: Prospect Heighs, IL
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ok I want something that looks big to impress people. Does this scope have good optics? Is it big? Could you tell me your opinions on this scope |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
opticsplanet.com Site Admin
Joined: 23 Sep 2003 Posts: 4044 Location: Prospect Heighs, IL
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi
I like refractors for their great images and light transmission. The CG4 mount is not Celestron's largest, but on a scope this size, it is adequate.
If you want the largest telescope for the money, you need to look at a Dobsonian such as the Celestron Starhooper 8", http://www.opticsplanet.net/celestron-star-hopper-8-dobsonians-telescope.html A Dob may not look all that "techie", but an 8" Dob is a serious deep-sky scope and is also one of the easiest manual scopes to use and operate. _________________ ----------------------
Your personal optics expert
Joanie (Jne) K
http://www.OpticsPlanet.com
Phone: (888) 263-0356
Fax: (847) 574-6820 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jimbo Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Eric, if you plan on going with a dob, you are guranteed to get the largest aperture for your money. Remember when buying a telescope, the magnification on the box means nothing, it all comes down to the aperture(size of the front lens) of the scope. That dob Jonie linked to is an excellent choice. However if you plan on doing some astrophotography I would reccomend getting the refractor because dob's are not the best choice for this purpose. I think either way you are going to get an excellent scope, and remember to keep you expectations in line, no telescope in the world is going to give you images like you see in the magizanes, those are the result of long exposure photo's and stacked images. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|