Bushnell legend Ultra HD or Legend 12x50

I agree with ET

The is virtually no difference between 10x and 12x in terms of detail. I'd go to at least 16-20x in a [link=http://www.opticsplanet.com/binoculars.html]binocular[/link], if you are going to the hassle of a [link=http://www.opticsplanet.com/tripods.html]tripod[/link] or, better yet, as ET says, just go to a [link=http://www.opticsplanet.com/spottingscopes.html]spotting scope[/link] and get some serious magnification.

If you have the [link=http://www.opticsplanet.com/tripods.html]tripod[/link] already, why not get a 300 dollar scope?
http://www.opticsplanet.com/vortex-namad-20-60x60mm-straight-spotting-scope-nmd-60s.html

scan at 20x. Zoom in for view.

My use - [link=http://www.opticsplanet.com/tripods.html]tripod[/link] mounted for scanning mountains, ridgelines, across desert for wildlife. For the same price should I go with the Legend Ultra HD 10 x 42 mm or the [link=http://www.opticsplanet.com/bushnell-legend-line.html]Bushnell Legend[/link] 12x50 Roof Prism [link=http://www.opticsplanet.com/binoculars.html]Binoculars[/link] ?