2,510 Brands 451 Categories All Departments

XR-5 AUTO GATED VS F9815 ( MX-11769 ).

Post a reply


Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
BBCode is ON
[img] is OFF
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: XR-5 AUTO GATED VS F9815 ( MX-11769 ).

Re: XR-5 AUTO GATED VS F9815 ( MX-11769 ).

Post by FIITS-14 on Mon Jul 29, 2013 10:17 am

Hello everyone :D it's me James mark trinity I'm back here again, thanks for your great help SL ATN corp, thanks so much, I'm appreciated to all the ATN CORP working office staff, which they've help me a lot of regarding about the night vision devices systerms & thermal imaging devices systerms, for the past few years, which I couldn't handle it, what is really night vision devices & thermal imaging is all about, & with their help, & finally through that, now I can handling on my own, thanks for your great help for once again, & I'll always support you all the way, you're so great, God bless everyone! ATN! :lol:

Re: XR-5 AUTO GATED VS F9815 ( MX-11769 ).

Post by SL ATN Corp on Fri Feb 15, 2013 6:01 pm

Technically the XR5 tubes are considered Gen 2+ since they use Multi-Alkali vs Gen 3 GaAs or Gallium Arsenide. The GaAs tubes are more sensitive to low light and have a much higher luminious sensitivity than Gen 2+ tubes. The Gen 3 will outperform the Gen 2+ in extreme low light conditions that you are asking about.

Re: XR-5 AUTO GATED VS F9815 ( MX-11769 ).

Post by Steven_L on Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:28 pm

Thanks, and same to you!

Re: XR-5 AUTO GATED VS F9815 ( MX-11769 ).

Post by JAMES MARK TRINITY on Mon Jan 30, 2012 12:49 pm

thank you!, steven l, for your info & detail of the image intensifiers tube, thank you for once again, have a nice day, & god bless.

Re: XR-5 AUTO GATED VS F9815 ( MX-11769 ).

Post by Steven_L on Mon Jan 30, 2012 10:51 am

The XR-5 Tube is made by the French company Photonis, and it is their version of the American ITT made Pinnacle tube, a thin-film autogated tube. The LPM range is the same, but the signal to noise ratio is higher on the Pinnacle, so resolution should be higher on the ITT tube. That being said, every tube is an individual, and since you are not comparing a single tube to a single tube, the question cannot be answered definitively as to which will perform better. Of course, no tube will work in a completely dark envirionment without an IR light. The Pinnacle tubes are generally considered the best on the market, but again, an exceptional individual XR-5 tube may outperform a Pinnacle tube in the lower end of their performance range.

XR-5 AUTO GATED VS F9815 ( MX-11769 ).

Post by JAMES MARK TRINITY on Thu Jan 26, 2012 10:22 am

HI, FRIENDS

I WANTED TO KNOW, THERE IS TWO TYPES OF, THE MOST POWERFULL IMAGE INTENSIFIERS TUBES, COMES UNDER GEN 3 AUTO GATED PINNACLE, I'M A BIT CONFUSING ABOUT THIS TWO TUBES, SPECIFICATION IS A BIT DIFFERENT, SO I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW, WHICH ONE IS THE BEST TUBE TO USE FOR SEEING IN THE DARK PLACE LIKE, IN THE DEEP JUNGLE & IN THE CAVE, TOTALLY 100% IN DARKNESS, IF ANYONE OF YOU MY DEAR FRIENDS HAS USE IT, FOR THIS TWO ULTIMATE TUBES BEFORE, WITH YOUR LONG YEARS OF EXPERIENCED, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO SHARE YOUR EXPERIENCED WITH ME,THANK YOU SO MUCH, GOD BLESS.

Top

cron