2,544 Brands 453 Categories All Departments

Bushnell legend Ultra HD or Legend 12x50

Post a reply


Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
BBCode is ON
[img] is OFF
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Bushnell legend Ultra HD or Legend 12x50

Re: Bushnell legend Ultra HD or Legend 12x50

Post by Jne_K on Mon Jun 14, 2010 1:06 pm

I agree with ET

The is virtually no difference between 10x and 12x in terms of detail. I'd go to at least 16-20x in a binocular, if you are going to the hassle of a tripod or, better yet, as ET says, just go to a spotting scope and get some serious magnification.

Re: Bushnell legend Ultra HD or Legend 12x50

Post by ET on Sat Jun 12, 2010 12:57 pm

If you have the tripod already, why not get a 300 dollar scope?
http://www.opticsplanet.com/vortex-nama ... d-60s.html

scan at 20x. Zoom in for view.

Bushnell legend Ultra HD or Legend 12x50

Post by Captm on Fri Jun 11, 2010 1:25 pm

My use - tripod mounted for scanning mountains, ridgelines, across desert for wildlife. For the same price should I go with the Legend Ultra HD 10 x 42 mm or the Bushnell Legend 12x50 Roof Prism Binoculars ?

Top