Products
2,496 Brands 483 Categories All Departments

Telescopes

Post a reply


Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
BBCode is ON
[img] is OFF
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Telescopes

Post by Jne_K on Tue Sep 23, 2008 5:37 am

Hi

Your lens at 70mm is f/4 and at 300mm, a f/5.6 You compare f numbers, so yes, the Williams at f/5.9 is slower, even compared to your 300mm setting.

If you like the zoom range on your lens, time to go shopping for a faster lens. Won't be cheap, because the faster the lens (lower the f/number), the bigger the lens and that's what drives the price up. I'd look for at least an f/4 at 300mm to make any significant difference.

Telescopes

Post by iogearadam on Mon Sep 22, 2008 10:24 pm

Hi,
I have a quick question regarding the difference of f numbers on telescopes and camera lenses.
I have a Nikon 70-300mm f/4-f/5.6 zoom lens which is so poor at night.
If you compare the lens to WilliamOptics 66mm f/5.9 refractor, is this refractor slower than the Nikon lens ?
I don't think this is true, but I'm not sure about it.
Hope you answer for me.
Thanks a lot.

Top