2,537 Brands 453 Categories All Departments

Yukon EXELON 3x50 or Pulsar RECON 550?

Post a reply


Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
BBCode is ON
[img] is OFF
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Yukon EXELON 3x50 or Pulsar RECON 550?

Re: Yukon EXELON 3x50 or Pulsar RECON 550?

Post by Trevor_B on Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:30 pm

Anytime. I know you will be very please with it!

Re: Yukon EXELON 3x50 or Pulsar RECON 550?

Post by Signifer on Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:44 am

Thanks for the response Trevor, very helpful. I've already heard good things about the Pulsar 550,I think I will take this. :-)

Re: Yukon EXELON 3x50 or Pulsar RECON 550?

Post by Trevor_B on Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:35 am

Biggest difference will be a traditional intensifier tube in the Exelon compared to the digital night vision in the Pulsar. I favor digital units over Gen 1 devices. You will get a further detection and recognition range. I also have noticed a sharper image in digital units over Gen 1. Trade off is digital will use more batteries and faster, usually 4-8 AA batteries and run them down about 25%-30% faster. Even still, I still would opt for a digital over a Gen 1 intensifier tube NV unit.

Yukon EXELON 3x50 or Pulsar RECON 550?

Post by Signifer on Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:02 am

Hi, I'm searching a monocular for night surveillance. I'm considering the Pulsar 550 and the Yukon Exelon. Which of these do you recommend?

Thanks in advance. :wink:

Top