FREE SHIPPING & FREE RETURNS*

FREE SHIPPING on Over 250,000 Products

Shop now and get Free Value Shipping on most orders over $49 to the contiguous 48 states, DC, and to all U.S. Military APO/FPO/DPO addresses.

Enjoy our FREE RETURNS

We want to ensure that making a return is as easy and hassle-free as possible! If for any reason you are not satisfied with your purchase, simply return the item within 30 days of receipt, and we'll cover the cost of return shipping. Learn more about our Return Policy.

Shopping Cart
DeSantis Intruder Holster - Style 105 for Colt, Kimber and Springfield
Currently Unavailable View Product
Compare (0)

Legacy Reviewer's Review of DeSantis Intruder Holster - Style 105 for Colt, Kimber and Springfield

What I liked:
This holster is well made and comfortable to wear IWB. Compared to another similar hybrid IWB holster that I own the Intuder is better made, with thicker plastic used on its belt clips, thick smooth leather on both sides that is stitched together around the border, & a nice heavy Kydex shell. It also cost almost $20 less than my other hybrid IWB holster - and Optics Planet offered free shipping.
My dislikes:
The belt clips only have 2 holes, so hieght/depth adjustment is limited. Additionally, the clips have the DeSantis horse logo on them and the words "holster.com" engraved beneath the horse symbol - not the most descrete clips for a concealed carry. Also, the Kydex is probably molded for a 4" 1911 style pistol, which is a bit long for my Kimball Ultra Carry II, which has a 3" barrel so it does not even reach the end of the Kydex shell. But that is not a big problem. One more thing, the leather "flap" above the belt line/kydex shell only partially sheilds the pistol's metal slide from touching my side. Again, not a big problem for me since I always wear an undershirt, but it might bother some other user.
Pros: Very well constructed, heavy duty clips & thick leather
Cons: Has limited adjustability for heigth/depth of holster

This review was written in the old system and had content requirements that are different than reviews written today.

Would Recommend: Yes
3 of 3 found the following review helpful.
Was it helpful to you? Yes | No
Share