Free Shipping & Free Returns*

FREE SHIPPING on Over 250,000 Products

Shop now and get Free Value Shipping on most orders over $49 to the contiguous 48 states, DC, and to all U.S. Military APO/FPO/DPO addresses.

Enjoy our FREE RETURNS

We want to ensure that making a return is as easy and hassle-free as possible! If for any reason you are not satisfied with your purchase, simply return the item within 30 days of receipt, and we'll cover the cost of return shipping. Learn more about our Return Policy.

Shopping Cart
Galco Hidden Agenda Concealed Leather Holster
$224.00 $197.99 Save 12%
View Product
Compare (0)

Legacy Reviewer's Review of Galco Hidden Agenda Concealed Leather Holster

I saved $46.98 (20%), plus free shipping at opticsplanet.com. You can'y get better than that. I bought the Galco Hidden Agenda and Accessory Panel. My local Galco dealer didn't have it, and I'm glad they didn't.

I'm a new CCW holder carrying a Springfield EMP on belt or shoulder hostler. I'll use the H.A. as a back up or when dressed in clothes that don't promote concealment.

Galco didn't take any short cuts in making the Hidden Agenda and Accessory Panel. The H.A. is extremely well built of soft, internally stiffened leather that won't print your gun.

The gun compartment holds my full size 1911 and spare mag in heavy elastic. The compartment has a heavy duty zipper with a small built in lock. If anyone asks what's in there, Ill say that it's my diary and it's private.

The accessory panel snaps in and has elastic sleeves for pens, business cards and cell phone, but I've found that bulky items don't work well. The H.A. came with a 12 month calender and I added a Day Runner telephone/address index, so it really is functional

The Galco Hidden Agenda may seem a little pricey, but it'll save me from buying new, bigger suits and sport coats for a while. And I'll be free to take my coat off when I use it as my primary carry.
Pros: Good Concealment, Holds Full Size 1911
Cons: Heavy With Full Size Firearm

This review was written in the old system and had content requirements that are different than reviews written today.

Would Recommend: Yes
17 of 18 found the following review helpful.
Was it helpful to you? Yes | No
Share