Reviews & Ratings for Nikon P-Rimfire 2-7x32 Rifle Scope — 34 reviews — Page 1

Put on my S&WMP15-22 Got zeroed very happy after 3rd range sessions would recommend elevation and windage adjustments were right on had to mount it forward abit to clear the charging handle shot at 25,50 yds

Typical high Nikon quality, this scope was a perect match for my S&W 15-22. I am currently using this at 50 feet indoors so the target is not as sharp as it would be at 50 yards (the paralax setting) but still is effective if the power is kept below 4x. The turrets are easy to use and the scope just works. I recommend it for rimfire use.

This is the second Nikon Scope I've purchased for mounting. Very good quality, and great optics. Would not hesitate to purchase from them again. Ballistics information on their website for various caliber / manufacturers Ammo is very useful.

I looked at a lot of basic rimfire scopes for my 10/22 and while there are some cheaper alternatives this Nikon scope strikes the right balance of quality and price. I especially like the associated Nikon app.

I put this scope on a 22lr AR upper biuld, it has a very clear and sharp view, makes a big difference in my accuracy. I have found with age I need to use a scope and can't use iron sights anymore. I am very pleased so far with this scppe and have bought a Nikon scope for my 556 upper.

I put the P-rimfire NP with quick adjust turrets on my custom 10/22. It is 1/4 moa at 50yds, the glass is very clear, the quality is awesome. Custom turrets cost $200 and you get 2 with this already amazing scope for only $150. No other scope on the competes with the value and quality at a $150 price point.

This is a great scope for the money! The lens is very clear as you would expect from Nikon scope. The adjustment are clear and easy to turn on the elevation and wind age. The caps that come with the scope are ok, but I will be changing them out with the Butler Creek covers.

The optics is built really well. The only issue I have is with the Nikon Spot-On app, not the scope. Shooting from a bench at an indoor range, the app doesn't give accurate ranges for the BDC reticle. Ammo, magnification, etc. we're input properly.

With any budget scope, you are giving up *something*. Each manufacturer has a different strategy for cost reduction. What will you give up? Mechanical Precision? Glass Quality? Durability? Reticle choice? FOV?

Nikon has done an excellent job in choosing what to give and not give in a budget rimfire optic. They kept what matters most in an optic like this. The glass is usefully good. The reticle is simple and not especially innovative, but far most useful because of the Spot On software.

The magnification range is about ideal for a rimfire. You won't be taking super long range shots with a rimfire, and 7x is more than sufficient. Better yet, the scope is usefully clear at that magnification-- no obvious distortion artifacts.

The adjustments are smooth. Magnification, diopter, and windage/elevation knobs all operate with good smoothness and refinement, with just the right amount of effort. The turrets aren't especially "clicky" but they aren't total mush, either.

I suspect that the accuracy of the turret adjustment is one area of cost reduction. The adjustments are 1/2 MOA, not 1/4 MOA, and I'm assuming they wouldn't set any "box test records". But who cares? You aren't going to be dialing in long range firing solutions with a $150 optic on a rimfire rifle. As long as it can achieve a zero and hold it, it's good enough.

The scope isn't super heavy, nor especially lightweight. On a Varmint-style .22, you won't really notice the extra weight. A light weight .22 will almost s...
Read More...

Great scope for the the money.i have mine mounted on a Ruger 77/22.i also have a Leupold version on a
10/22.the glass i would give the edge to the Leupold but every thing else is equal to or better. other down side of the Nikon is its country of origin.its not made in the USA but at least its not made in China.