Free Shipping & Free Returns*

FREE SHIPPING on Over 250,000 Products

Shop now and get Free Value Shipping on most orders over $49 to the contiguous 48 states, DC, and to all U.S. Military APO/FPO/DPO addresses.

Enjoy our FREE RETURNS

We want to ensure that making a return is as easy and hassle-free as possible! If for any reason you are not satisfied with your purchase, simply return the item within 30 days of receipt, and we'll cover the cost of return shipping. Learn more about our Return Policy.

Shopping Cart

Trying to decide between the Meade Starnavigator NG127 Mak-Cas and the Meade ETX 125 Mak. Both similar as far as aperture but is the ETX worth the $ — 1 Answer

by Jerry, from CA, United States Asked on October 8, 2018

Name Meade StarNavigator NG Maksutov-Cassegrain Telescope
Currently Unavailable View Product
Continue As a Guest
Saving...
Sign In or Create an Account (optional)
Why use an OpticsPlanet.com account for my questions and answers?

Having an account with OpticsPlanet.com makes writing questions and answers even better! We’ll save all of your questions and answers in your account, provide you easy access to them, so you can see how the community has responded.

If you’d like to add a question without creating an account, you can proceed with filling out the fields on this form.

Show
Sort by
Filter by
A
Answered by Woody Wood, member, from NY, United States, on March 16, 2019

The ETX refers to the mount. The tube or OTA (optical tube assembly) is the same. The autostar hand controller is also the same The advantage of the ETX model is it’s more sturdy and stable, the tripod is more robust giving you a steadier viewing experience. The base on the ETX has a polar align option which allows you the ability to take astro photos more successfully than with the StarNavigtor. It’s definitely worth spending a few extra dollars. When you want to step up into a larger telescope the ETX will sell in the secondary market.

Was it helpful to you? Yes | No
Last updated 2025-11-12 UTC.