Bob from United States, CA Public Profile

Just used them at the range yesterday and had no problems with them. Mac-Gar mags have never given me problems with my 22/45 or my Beretta 92FS. The springs are strong and the finish is top notch.
There are no negatives to these magazines.

I was a little hesitant to order this stock at first. Some reviewers noted lines/ridges and other artifacts left over from the manufacturing process. I worried needlessly.
While there is a line at the top of the stock which can be both seen and felt, it is no where near enough to worry about. One reviewer stated that he sanded, filled and then smoothed the ridge/line at the top of the stock. Way too much thinking involved there. There is also a slight depression on both sides where the receiver extension tube in the stock was formed. Again, no big deal. M16s were NEVER as pretty as some people think they were. Both are not visible from a few feet, if you are worried about it. I am not and this stock looks plenty pretty.
The storage compartment is 8.5" deep. I have not tried storing my old school cleaning kit. Looks like a tight fit. The color of the compartment walls is light yellow, reminds me of fiberglass. The trap door is plastic. Would have preferred metal but the door feels sturdy and should survive butt stroking many Antifa douche bags...I kid, I kid! I am a lover not a fighter.
The end of the stock is textured much like a standard M4 butt plate. Length of pull may not suit those who want shorter length of pull, so adding a pad may not be an option for some. As light as the recoil should be, I believe the pad is not necessary.
The buffer and buffer spring look to be top quality. Since I have not had the chance to use this stock at the range, I cannot comment to a