Reviews by Chris
Best gas block. No carbon locking, no long hex wrenches.
Written on Apr 29, 2026
Review for
Riflespeed Gas Control .750in Assembly Block
To my knowledge, this is the only adjustable gas block design on the market that doesn’t require frequent cleaning to avoid carbon locking.
From a performance standpoint, the main con is a little added weight, but it’s barely noticeable.
Before you install this gas block, make sure to remove any burrs or sharp edges inside the gas port hole, since these can shave off slivers of the copper jacket which can get stuck in the pin.
From a performance standpoint, the main con is a little added weight, but it’s barely noticeable.
Before you install this gas block, make sure to remove any burrs or sharp edges inside the gas port hole, since these can shave off slivers of the copper jacket which can get stuck in the pin.
1 of 1 found the following review helpful.
Perfect for Vortex Spitfire 5x
Written on Jul 09, 2025
It sets the vortex spitfire back just the right distance so I can comfortably use the optic. The absolute co-witness puts the optic height at roughly the same position as the vortex OEM high mount.
The mount is rigid and has a good quality appearance.
The mount is rigid and has a good quality appearance.
0 of 0 found the following review helpful.
PA needs to fix the mount fasteners
Written on Jul 09, 2025
Review for
Primary Arms SLx 3x MicroPrism Red Dot Sight
The optic itself is fine. It’s compact, lightweight, has reasonable eye relief, and is acceptable quality for the price.
The issue is the fasteners for the mount.
First, the manual calls for torquing the 10-32 cross bolts to 55-60 in-lbs. I did this, set the rifle down, and 15 minutes later, a fractured cross bolt pops out of the hole.
Second, the 10-32 x 5/16 low profile screws have a 2.5mm hex socket. The threaded holes in the mount have locking helicoils with a ~15 in-lb running torque. The manual specifies 25-30 in-lb installation torque. These tiny hex sockets will strip at around 20 in-lbs.
I contacted the PA customer service. The service reps were responsive and easy to work with. They informed me that the torques in the manual were erroneously high, gave me lower torque values to use, and offered to send me a replacement mount. I received the new mount within a few days, free of charge.
I ended up using a screw extractor to remove a few screws and I replaced all the 10-32 x 5/16” ones with off-the-shelf alloy steel button head screws with 1/8” hex sockets. I had to machine down the head diameters to fit, but otherwise, these worked so much better than the OEM screws.
It’s frustrating that PA did nothing to fix this product flaw or alert customers about it. There are Reddit posts dating back 3 years describing this exact same issue. And all of the PDF versions of the manual on the PA website still list the higher torque values.
I have trouble trusting the produc
The issue is the fasteners for the mount.
First, the manual calls for torquing the 10-32 cross bolts to 55-60 in-lbs. I did this, set the rifle down, and 15 minutes later, a fractured cross bolt pops out of the hole.
Second, the 10-32 x 5/16 low profile screws have a 2.5mm hex socket. The threaded holes in the mount have locking helicoils with a ~15 in-lb running torque. The manual specifies 25-30 in-lb installation torque. These tiny hex sockets will strip at around 20 in-lbs.
I contacted the PA customer service. The service reps were responsive and easy to work with. They informed me that the torques in the manual were erroneously high, gave me lower torque values to use, and offered to send me a replacement mount. I received the new mount within a few days, free of charge.
I ended up using a screw extractor to remove a few screws and I replaced all the 10-32 x 5/16” ones with off-the-shelf alloy steel button head screws with 1/8” hex sockets. I had to machine down the head diameters to fit, but otherwise, these worked so much better than the OEM screws.
It’s frustrating that PA did nothing to fix this product flaw or alert customers about it. There are Reddit posts dating back 3 years describing this exact same issue. And all of the PDF versions of the manual on the PA website still list the higher torque values.
I have trouble trusting the produc
2 of 2 found the following review helpful.
There are no reviews that match your criteria. Would you like to
reset filters?