Duncan from United States, VA Public Profile

Have brand new Sig P320 17rd factory mags (square hole same as these bases made for), the base notch grooves are not cut wide enough by two thousands of an inch. Simpily no room or possible solution to correct. Mag wings are very thin and the most shallow I've ever seen on an OEM so no material to sand down. Returning.

I got this to mount on a 10/22 for ease of use being fixed power yet still having a parallax adjustment. It is 19oz whiched checked the weight box for being not obnoxiously heavy. I also liked the overall size and the small objective lens. The turrents turn easy with audible clicks. The focus knob is tight and is certainly set in meters. I think the optical clarity is high quality and considering it is not some $100 scope it should be. For finding .22 holes on regular white paper at 50 yards I could just make them out. Over reactive paper it would be easy. Very pleased with this for how I have it setup on. Low mounts worked better for cheek weld.

Tried out this muzzle brake by JL Billet on a .308. Before I had Precision Armament's M4-72, the cat's pajamas of brakes in terms of performance.
PA's brake does reduce felt recoil to a gentle soft nudge that was most welcome and impressive but had the blast of a miniture howitzer. I felt like doubling-up on foam inserts and muffs was not enough with that plus the concusive shockwave became enough to relocate your spleen to a random place. So I tried out this other brake. I was most pleased. It has a well thought out design that not only looks great but is enough to tame the recoil without excessive gasses or flash. It has only a 15° back angle in the first chamber then less each slot after that before the exit, with each tilting down (directs muzzle to fight upward tendency). They put cut-outs in places that most likely aid in the reduction of pressure by diverting the gasses via interupting the walls to not give a place to linger. The top center channel is cut out and has a groove inlayed to channel what does escape upwards out and away with some downward force. Holes milled on top and in the face reduce pressure further.
I'd venture to guess if one were to compare the M4-72's performance to this one it would be 90% vs 75% reduction in recoil. I felt no sharp harsh thrust in the body as without a brake on the 18" barrel but a good firm push back, just not as soft as what the M4-72 did; yet none of the obnoxious blasting out, and eve

Looks cool but all it does in my case for a 18" 308 is project the sound forward. The recoil was greatly affected after taking off my M4-72 brake and trying this. My rig is 12 pounds total, a bench blaster, and found it dancing alot with the Kaw. For a 5.56 maybe okay. Yet the only benefit I see is being a volume reduction vs the 45° vents of the M4-72. Will try a brake with 90° angles to see if using just foam inserts is sufficient. As I find it not comfortable only having foam plugs in with the brake I did with the Kaw, however the Kaw offers not enough muzzle control for a .308, even a heavy setup as mine.

The Tango lineup is great. These 4 series are lighter than the 6 models with plenty of reach. On an AR, the low power is useful and past 12x really works for distance. I like it a great deal with my setup on an upper with a Weaver one-piece. The one I got was black, not grey if that helps. 20oz is managable. Great glass, clear.

This fits in a Sig MPX Gen2. I have not tried it yet (only tested the safety), but it is a few ounces over 4lbs on my scale using a Tipton cap in the chamber. The mainspring looks crooked or off but WilsonCombat said this is by design so dont try to bend it! One may have to put in the bottom pin first then wiggle the top pin. There are two very small springs at the base of the unit, they can be pressed down hard to help with the 2nd pin. The feel of this trigger is very high quality.