Paul Hill from United States, NC Public Profile

I dud function and fitness tests on more than 10 of these selectors 7 of which required fitment and function modification work prior to range test. All customers but one agreed to me removing material from lower reciever. One wanted the selector modified instead. As of today 6/17/2026 all are still functioning without any issues,Keeping parts clean and lubed is a key to long-term life. All have over 1000rds through them with 4 having between 2000-3000rds. 1 shows more wear than the others and I question its,manufacturing heat and manufacturing defects? For the price they can't be beat. If you have zero binding on assembly and cycle and inspect parts after cycles to be sure of wear not felt but visible you should have plenty of fun and durability. The 9mm platform requires slight bolt modification as trip binds on bottom of bolt preventing full bold closure and extreme part wear and function failure. There isnt enough materail to modify the trip of selector and expect to not have failure. For 22cal i had many issues and they are close to the same of the 9mm. I do have a fully fuctioning 22lr that after bolt modification and trip correction function test was fine,the issue was trigger reset. I knew instantly it was due to round velocity not having the force to reset trigger and cycle the bolt. I Went through my parta been and found lighter springs and after several attemps I have the sweetest 22 I've ever owned,over 3000rds and still going. 2 fails to eject (My fault as I had t