Free Shipping & Free Returns*

FREE SHIPPING on Over 250,000 Products

Shop now and get Free Value Shipping on most orders over $49 to the contiguous 48 states, DC, and to all U.S. Military APO/FPO/DPO addresses.

Enjoy our FREE RETURNS

We want to ensure that making a return is as easy and hassle-free as possible! If for any reason you are not satisfied with your purchase, simply return the item within 30 days of receipt, and we'll cover the cost of return shipping. Learn more about our Return Policy.

Shopping Cart
Fobus Roto Tactical Speed Holster - Fits Glock 17, 22, 31 and Ruger 345 - holds Handgun with Laser or Light GLT17RB
Currently Unavailable View Product
Compare (0)

Legacy Reviewer's Review of Fobus Roto Tactical Speed Holster - Fits Glock 17, 22, 31 and Ruger 345 - holds Handgun with Laser or Light GLT17RB

This holster is highly adjustable and can be quickly fitted to either a slotted-belt or paddle style attachment. The materials are first-class and it is difficult for me to imagine many situations or uses that would cause the bindings and/or mechanisms to break or fail.

That having been said, the rigidity of the holster's materials will likely produce wear marks on most firearm finishes that I am aware of. While this is a common result with snug/custom-fitting retainment holsters, it is a point worth making that one should purchase the Fobus holster with 'business' and function in mind rather than expecting it to be appropriate for 'collector' or competition-type weapons.

The holster was very accurately designed and built to the dimensions of my S&W MP40, which is equipped with a Viridian X5L laser-sight. With practice and a slight breaking-in period, the side draw from this holster proves to be consistent and predictable, yet robust in terms of retention.

Overall, it has met my expectations and was by and large worth its price.
Pros: Good retention; secure belt attachment; rigid/durable construction; adjustable cant/drop
Cons: Hard shell abrasive to slide/barrel finish (creates wear marks)

This review was written in the old system and had content requirements that are different than reviews written today.

Would Recommend: Yes
4 of 4 found the following review helpful.
Was it helpful to you? Yes | No
Share