Free Shipping & Free Returns*

FREE SHIPPING on Over 250,000 Products

Shop now and get Free Value Shipping on most orders over $49 to the contiguous 48 states, DC, and to all U.S. Military APO/FPO/DPO addresses.

Enjoy our FREE RETURNS

We want to ensure that making a return is as easy and hassle-free as possible! If for any reason you are not satisfied with your purchase, simply return the item within 30 days of receipt, and we'll cover the cost of return shipping. Learn more about our Return Policy.

Shopping Cart
Minox ZA 5 1.5-8x32 Lightweight Shotgun Rifle Scope
Currently Unavailable View Product
Compare (0)

Legacy Reviewer's Review of Minox ZA 5 1.5-8x32 Lightweight Shotgun Rifle Scope

I bought this light scope with a #4 reticle and really like it vs. the plex (basic cross hairs). It's mo0unted on top of a Ruger M77 that I converted to a 6.5CM. It shoots fantastic and the glass is very clear. This year I harvested a doe at close range 65 yards, but it was at 10min before 7 in legal light, but still on a dark overcast morning. The scope was excellent in the lower light for a smaller objective scope. Very crisp and clear. I like the windage and elevation knobs that are easy to read, adjust, and positive clicks. I like the caps on the knobs, they have positive contact and sturdy. I own Minox, Swarovski, and Leupold scopes. This scope easily passes Leupold in clarity and is on par with quality. It's not as clear as my Swarovski, but it's a fraction of the price. Two major options that set this scope apart is a 4" eye relief and a nice rubber armor or ring on the ocular. If you put this on a heavy magnum African rifle you won't have to worry about losing a chunk of skin if you scope yourself. Leupold doesn't do that on it's VX3's. Also it's hard to find a scope that goes from 1.5X8 range. If you turn this down to 1.5X you can easily shoot both eyes open and that's the power I had it on when I took my doe.
Pros: excellent glass quality and rubber eye cup
Cons: none yet

This review was written in the old system and had content requirements that are different than reviews written today.

Would Recommend: Yes
8 of 8 found the following review helpful.
Was it helpful to you? Yes | No
Share