Free Shipping & Free Returns*

FREE SHIPPING on Over 250,000 Products

Shop now and get Free Value Shipping on most orders over $49 to the contiguous 48 states, DC, and to all U.S. Military APO/FPO/DPO addresses.

Enjoy our FREE RETURNS

We want to ensure that making a return is as easy and hassle-free as possible! If for any reason you are not satisfied with your purchase, simply return the item within 30 days of receipt, and we'll cover the cost of return shipping. Learn more about our Return Policy.

Shopping Cart
Pelican Storm Cases Custom Rifle Cases (No Foam) with FieldPak Soft-Sided Bags - Black
Currently Unavailable View Product
Compare (0)

Legacy Reviewer's Review of Pelican Storm Cases Custom Rifle Cases (No Foam) with FieldPak Soft-Sided Bags - Black


I would not recommend the Storm IM330 + FieldPak combo, but I would recommend the Storm case. The Storm case itself is a quality product. FYI, the padlock holes are approximately 3/8" wide and fit my masterlocks with a shackle diameter of 5/16".

The FieldPaks are no longer made by Eagle Industries; they are now made by Bulldog. I called and confirmed this with Pelican. The padding is not sufficient enough to secure your rifles if the case were to be tossed around. The padded divider is very thin and should not be the only thing that separates your scopes if you plan to use the FieldPak for two scoped rifles. My current set up with the FieldPak is one scoped rifle on each side of the divider, with Eagle scope covers protecting my $1,000+ scopes. I only use the combo for storage and car transport. I would not try the combo for heavy use.

The FieldPak also comes with one 5x7 molle attached medical pouch, two molle attached crown covers, and four velcro attachment straps. There is also a shoulder strap with HK style sling hooks.

Overall, this combo is definitely not worth it since the FieldPak is no longer made by Eagle. Bulldogs quality is subpar and hurts Pelicans name.
Pros: Storm case is very sturdy and can hold two rifles.
Cons: FieldPak padding is thin and feels cheap.

This review was written in the old system and had content requirements that are different than reviews written today.

Would Recommend: No
8 of 8 found the following review helpful.
Was it helpful to you? Yes | No
Share
Last updated 2025-11-12 UTC.