Reviews by MSR Gal
Highly Recomment For Tikka T3x Rifles
Written on Mar 04, 2026
Tikka only uses #6 scope screws, not #8 like most use. but they put a large hole for a recoil lug in the top of the receiver. not all rails have provision for this lug. But AREA 419 does. Witout it, a heavy scope might shear the #6 screws under recoil. So be secure and use this rail with lug. Also, you want this 20 MOA rail, not a 0 MOA rail. Or you could run out if scope adjustment if zeroing for long range.
0 of 0 found the following review helpful.
This is the "0" MOA version - I needed and recommend the 20MOA version
Written on Mar 03, 2026
Optocs Planet let me return this and I bought the 20 MOA verion of the same Area 419 rail. The quality of the rail is great and Optics Planet customer service is top knotch.
0 of 0 found the following review helpful.
I deal rail for mounting heavy scopes on Tikka T3x rifles
Written on Feb 26, 2026
This is my second Area 419 Tikka rail. In combination with Seekins Medium-High (.92") rings, its the perfect home for my Burris Veracity PH 4-20x50 scope.
0 of 0 found the following review helpful.
Burris Veracity PH Scopes are "da bomb"
Written on Feb 18, 2026
This is my second Veracity PH. My first was the 2.5-12x42 model. I really love it. The new 4-20x50 is waiting to be mounted on my Tikka T3x 260 Ackley Improved once the gunsmith finishes the rechambering job.
0 of 0 found the following review helpful.
Does Not Fit pre-1996 S&W 442 and 642 Airweight Centennials
Written on Feb 03, 2016
If your S&W Airweight Centennial is the later, post 1996, 442-1, 442-2, 642-1, or 642-2 then this laser will fit.
LaserMax literature and web site states that this fits the "442" and "642" (no dash mentioned). It does not. The pre-1996 442 "no-dash" and 642 "no-dash" have a 0.060" shorter frame and cylinder than the later "-1" and "-2" models. So you have to compress the laser housing 0.060" to mount it and with this much strain in the housing it will never stay on through repeated firings.
It’s not a quality issue, it’s just that LaserMax does not seem to be aware that there was a major dimensional changes to the S&W Centennial in 1996.
LaserMax literature and web site states that this fits the "442" and "642" (no dash mentioned). It does not. The pre-1996 442 "no-dash" and 642 "no-dash" have a 0.060" shorter frame and cylinder than the later "-1" and "-2" models. So you have to compress the laser housing 0.060" to mount it and with this much strain in the housing it will never stay on through repeated firings.
It’s not a quality issue, it’s just that LaserMax does not seem to be aware that there was a major dimensional changes to the S&W Centennial in 1996.
1 of 1 found the following review helpful.
There are no reviews that match your criteria. Would you like to
reset filters?